Learning and Communicating Online for Standards- myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theLearning and Communicating Online for Standards. Answer: Credible source draw authenticity and reasoning in ones text. At the same time, credible sources allow for further reading and interpretation of text thus completing the essence of research. The use of credible sources in research is important as the audience receiving an assertion would always demand for a credible evidence of information provided ( Metzger, 2007) . Provision of credible sources assist learners to trace back information and dig for more related text during further research. Research involves the observation and examination of facts and literature from other peoples published work and analysis. The use of non-credible sources damages research work as information from any source might be mere allegation or personal observation which might be farther from the truth (Weaver, 2010) . Eventually, it leads to unsustainable research that cannot be proved anywhere thus cannot be used in obtaining marks in any institute of education. Moreover, it is important to use credible sources as ones task can be used for reference or as a backup in other subsequent studies. According to Braasch, Brten McCrudden, (2018), provision of non-existent sources would lead to automatic disqualification of data provided however true they may be. The use of non-credible sources results into bulk information full of fallacies and unjustified study findings. Finally, such information remains trash as it cannot be used by anyone else during research work due to lack of merit. On the other hand, academic writing and research involves accreditation and penalties in institutions of learning. Such penalties affect the general good will as information remains distorted and thus lack credibility in convincing other learners towards the findings in a research work. In remaining relevant and producing quality work, it is essential to stick to the use of credible sources that can be verified and used for further research by peer reviewers in a given field. Professional research calls for the use of credible sources as the information remains essential in problem solving. During problem solving, real information is used in handling a given fact or figures needed for practical aspects in different areas of an organization. The use of non-credible sources amounts to useless information that cannot be used to tackle issues at hand due to lack of merit and verifiability (VARDI, 2012). Research assists in a career development where one is expected to use the findings in developing aspects applicable to a career. Thus, opting to use credible sources amounts to a successful implementation of an idea in ones workplace. At the same time, the use of credible sources proves the ability of one to research and find solution that is justifiable. Using credible sources draws confidence not only to the researcher but also the audience expecting to receive the information and digest it for future use (Hewson Stewart, 2016). Persons are judged to be professional based on the way they undertake their work, and in this case a research at hand. Using the right sources draws the assumption of a straight forward and research oriented individual who carries in-depth research on a given matter. Professionals use research in finding real-time solutions for the day-to-day challenges in organization and the society. According to ("Reliable Research: How to Determine If a Source is Credible Accurate - Video Lesson Transcript | Study.com," n.d.), the use of correct sources and accepted guidelines amounts to true information which remains relevant and applicable to a given problem. On the contrary, the use of non-verifiable sources amounts to personalized opinion and blogs which do not count in terms of peer reviewed articles or information which might result to plagiarism (Bundy, 2014) . As such, it fails to depict the true image of a situation as the facts expressed remain either a fallacy or personal opinion which differs from one to the other. In the comparison, I picked a journal article on the process of guiding early primary children in online learning methods on Wikipedia and another from a journal documenting the process of online learning and information search. The two sources differ immensely in the manner in which they present information and their backing or evidence of learning. The Wikipedia source remains inauthentic as it only lists the steps and benefits of doing so (Wikipedia, 2018). However, the peer reviewed journal focuses on experimental research where the literature on children handling in online learning is conducted and similarities between the two noted in the findings (Mukherji Albon, 2018). Further, it documents information and references from other like sources which makes the work authentic as opposed to the case of the former which relies on personal opinion. (Metzger, 2007) Moreover, Wikipedia lists a number of issues expressed by the author without proper references to works that justify the same (Wikipedia, 2018). In this respect, it becomes superior to the latter as Wikipedia relies on information published by individuals. Furthermore, journal articles are always reviewed by peer members of the same field before publishing thus drawing much trust as opposed to Wikipedia which relies on the information obtained by individuals and fostered by the rest regardless of their experience and education (Kear, 2012). The use of credible sources is efficient in my professional field as it guarantees success and authenticity of a study. Besides, it gives me the confidence to always revert to it as well as allowing others use my information to carry further reading on the same. Professionals do things in the right way and so is the use of credible source as opposed to the short cut of obtaining information from non-peer reviewed sources. The information obtained would assist me in carrying out professional work and obtaining practical results in the study. References Mukherji, P., Albon, D. (2018). Research methods in early childhood: An introductory guide. Sage. Wikipedia(2018). "Virtual Schools". Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_school Braasch, J. L., Brten, I., McCrudden, M. T. (2018). Introduction to Research on Multiple Source Use. In Handbook of Multiple Source Use (pp. 13-26). Routledge. Bundy, A. (Ed.). (2014). Australian and New Zealand Literacy framework: principles, standards and practice. (2nd ed.). Retrieved from:https://www.utas.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/79068/anz-info-lit-policy.pdf Hewson, C., Stewart, D. W. (2016). Internet research methods. John Wiley Sons, Ltd. Kear, K. (2012). 'Collaboration via online discussion forums: issues and approaches'. In H.M, Donelan, K.L, Kear, M.A., Ramage, (eds.), Online communication and collaboration: A reader. EBL ebook library. Retrieved from https://SWIN.eblib.com.au/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=987934 Metzger,M.J. (2007). Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research - Metzger - 2007 - Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology - Wiley Online Library. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/asi.20672(Metzger, 2007) Reliable Research: How to Determine If a Source is Credible Accurate - Video Lesson Transcript | Study.com. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://study.com/academy/lesson/reliable-research-how-to-determine-if-a-source-is-credible-accurate.html VARDI,I. (2012, December 4). Developing students' referencing skills: a matter of plagiarism, punishment and morality or of learning to write critically? Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.673120 Weaver,D. (2010). Plagiarism man | Swinburne Commons. Retrieved from https://commons.swinburne.edu.au/items/58fd145f-9b9a-4751-b836-71306e1e6744/1/